Drug Safety 2009;

نویسندگان

  • Penny J. Lewis
  • Tim Dornan
  • David Taylor
  • Mary P. Tully
  • Val Wass
  • Darren M. Ashcroft
چکیده

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379 1. Literature Search Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 1.1 Search Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 1.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 1.3 Data Abstraction and Validity Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 1.4 Quantitative Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 2. Literature Search Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 2.1 Study Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 2.1.1 Country and Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 2.1.2 Types of Hospitals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 2.1.3 Numbers of Hospitals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 2.1.4 Specialties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 2.1.5 Study Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 2.1.6 Methods of Error Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 2.1.7 Validation Review of Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 2.2 Definitions of Prescribing Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 2.3 Prevalence and Incidence of Prescribing Errors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 2.4 Medications Involved in Prescribing Errors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384 2.5 Types of Prescribing Errors Detected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384 2.6 Severity of Detected Prescribing Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384 3. Discussion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384 4. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 Abstract Prescribing errors affect patient safety throughout hospital practice. Previous reviews of studies have often targeted specific populations or settings, or did not adopt a systematic approach to reviewing the literature. Therefore, we set out to systematically review the prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (all from 1985 to October 2007) were searched for studies of prescriptions for adult or child hospital REVIEW ARTICLE Drug Safety 2009; 32 (5): 379-389 0114-5916/09/0005-0379/$49.95/0Prescribing errors affect patient safety throughout hospital practice. Previous reviews of studies have often targeted specific populations or settings, or did not adopt a systematic approach to reviewing the literature. Therefore, we set out to systematically review the prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (all from 1985 to October 2007) were searched for studies of prescriptions for adult or child hospital REVIEW ARTICLE Drug Safety 2009; 32 (5): 379-389 0114-5916/09/0005-0379/$49.95/0 a 2009 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The future of drug safety testing: expanding the view and narrowing the focus.

Drug safety remains a high profile issue at a time when the cost and time required to develop a new drug are at an all time high. Balancing risk against the expected clinical benefit is the primary purpose of preclinical and clinical testing. We offer an expanded view on the application of predictive strategies and technologies to early safety decisions and suggestions to narrow the focus for i...

متن کامل

The efficacy of a condensed Seeking Safety intervention for women in residential chemical dependence treatment at 30 days posttreatment.

This study examined the efficacy of a condensed version of the Seeking Safety intervention in the reduction of trauma-related symptoms and improved drug abstinence rates among women in residential chemical dependence treatment. One hundred and four women were randomly assigned to treatment including a condensed (six session) Seeking Safety intervention or the standard chemical dependence interv...

متن کامل

Traffic safety application & scenario requirements

Currently, vehicles use safety systems like airbags or seat belts to increase the traffic safety of passengers during traffic accidents. In the near future, most new vehicles will be equipped with other type of traffic safety applications, which could prevent vehicles from e.g., traffic accident crashing. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of these future traffic safety applica...

متن کامل

Drug development: from concept to marketing!

Drug development is an expensive, long and high-risk business taking 10-15 years and is associated with a high attrition rate. It is driven by medical need, disease prevalence and the likelihood of success. Drug candidate selection is an iterative process between chemistry and biology, refining the molecular properties until a compound suitable for advancing to man is found. Typically, about on...

متن کامل

The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007: drug safety and health-system pharmacy implications: introduction.

PURPOSE To describe the drug safety provisions of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) of 2007, including risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS), and the implications for health-system pharmacists. SUMMARY The FDAAA grants FDA new authorities to require postmarketing studies or clinical trials of human drugs and to require REMS. The REMS provisions of the FDAAA re...

متن کامل

Market-based control: the solution to slow progress with patient safety?

informed decision making. Finding the balance for patient safety and quality. JAMA 2008;300:2913–15. 4. Mills PD, Neilly J, Kinney LM, et al. Effective interventions and implementation strategies to reduce adverse drug events in the Veterans Affairs (VA) system. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:37–46. 5. Wachter RM, Flanders SA, Fee C, et al. Public reporting of antibiotic timing in patients with p...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009